Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/12168
Title: Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open technique and how to reach quality standards: A single-center experience in Thailand
Authors: T. Taweemonkongsap
C. Nualyong
T. Amornvesukit
S. Srinualnad
S. Jitpraphai
N. Premasathian
P. Sujijantararat
A. Tantiwong
S. Soontrapa
Mahidol University
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2011
Citation: Transplantation Proceedings. Vol.43, No.10 (2011), 3593-3598
Abstract: We report our experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) compared with open donor nephrectomy (ODN). Prognostic factors associated with adverse outcomes in LDN were identified. From January 2000 to December 2009, 243 consecutive live-donor nephrectomies were performed, including 129 LDNs and 114 ODNs. We compared patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and recipient graft function in each group. Prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in LDN were investigated using uni- and multivariate analyses. Patient demographics, except mean donor age (P =.032), were similar between groups. Mean operative time (219 vs 163 minutes; P < .001) and warm ischemia time (WIT; 3.1 vs 1.7 minutes; P < .001) were significantly longer in LDN. Conversely, mean analgesic requirement (9.2 vs 14.7 mg morphine; P < .001) and postoperative hospital stay (6.5 vs 7.1 days; P =.003) were significantly lower with LDN. Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was slightly lower in LDN (P =.15). There were 7 conversions from LDN to ODN. Complication rates were similar between the groups (P =.38). Delayed graft function (10.9% vs 1.7%; P =.016) and mean serum creatinine level at 1 month (1.47 vs 1.3 mg/dL; P =.04) were higher for LDN. However, 5-year allograft survival was not inferior among LDN (90% vs 85%; P =.42). Mean operative time (268 to 175 minutes; P < .001), EBL (316 to 66 mL; P < .001), and complication incidence (8 to 0 cases; P < .002) gradually decreased from the initial 43 cases to the last 43 cases of LDNs. Among surgeons who had performed-30 LDNs, the mean operative time and WIT were 197 mL and 2.8 minutes, respectively. Based on our evidence, LDN was a feasible and safe surgical option for live-donor nephrectomy, even in a small volume center. Better results can be achieved after a learning curve of experience for both the surgeon and the institution. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=83655197267&origin=inward
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/12168
ISSN: 18732623
00411345
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2011-2015

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.