Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Comparability of tympanic and oral mercury thermometers at high ambient temperatures|
|Authors:||Amy L. Chue|
Rachael L. Moore
Elizabeth A. Ashley
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit
|Keywords:||Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology|
|Citation:||BMC Research Notes. Vol.5, (2012)|
|Abstract:||Background: Body temperature can be measured in seconds with tympanic thermometers as opposed to minutes with mercury ones. The aim of this study was to compare tympanic and oral mercury thermometer measurements under high ambient field temperatures. Results: Tympanic temperature (measured thrice by 3 operators) was compared to oral temperature measured once with a mercury-in-glass thermometer in 201 patients (aged 5years), on the Thai-Myanmar border. Ambient temperature was measured with an electronic thermo-hygrometer. Participants had a mean [min-max] age of 27 [5-60] years and 42% (84) were febrile by oral thermometer. The mean difference in the mercury and tympanic temperature measurement for all observers/devices was 0.09 (95%CI 0.07-0.12)°C and intra-class correlation for repeat tympanic measurements was high (0.97) for each observer. Deviations in tympanic temperatures were not related to ambient temperature. Conclusion: Clinically significant differences were not observed between oral and tympanic temperature measurements at high ambient temperatures in a rural tropical setting. © 2012 Chue et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.|
|Appears in Collections:||Scopus 2011-2015|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.