Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A prospective comparison of co-amoxiclav and the combination of chloramphenicol, doxycycline, and co-trimoxazole for the oral maintenance treatment of melioidosis|
M. D. Smith
D. A.B. Dance
N. J. White
University of Oxford
|Keywords:||Immunology and Microbiology;Medicine|
|Citation:||Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.89, No.5 (1995), 546-549|
|Abstract:||An open randomized comparison of the oral ‘conventional’ regimen (combination of chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole and doxycycline) and co-amoxiclav for the maintenance treatment of melioidosis was conducted in Ubon Ratchatani, north-eastern Thailand, between 1989 and 1992. The total antibiotic treatment duration was 20 weeks. Of 101 patients followed, 10 (10% 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.9—17.5%) subsequently relapsed: 2 of 52 patients (4%) inthe oral ‘conventional’ group, and 8 of 49 patients (16%) receiving oral co-amoxiclav. This compares with a relapse rate of 23% in our previous study of 8 weeks’ totaltherapy. Only 50% of patients complied with the 20 weeks’ treatment regimen and poor compliance proved the most significant risk factor for subsequent relapse (relative risk [RR] 4.9, 95% CI 1.2—20.3). Neither the presence of known underlying disease nor choice of initial patenteral treatment was significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse. Co-amoxiclav is saferand better tolerated, but may be less effective (RR of relapse 0.4, 95%CI 0.2—1.2) thanthe oral ‘conventional’ regimen. The minimum duration of total treatment with either regimen should be 12—20 weeks, depending on clinical progress. © 1995 Oxford University Press.|
|Appears in Collections:||Scopus 1991-2000|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.