Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/29624
Title: | Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia |
Authors: | Giuseppe Saglio Dong Wook Kim Surapol Issaragrisil Philipp Le Coutre Gabriel Etienne Clarisse Lobo Ricardo Pasquini Richard E. Clark Andreas Hochhaus Timothy P. Hughes Neil Gallagher Albert Hoenekopp Mei Dong Ariful Haque Richard A. Larson Hagop M. Kantarjian Universita degli Studi di Torino The Catholic University of Korea Mahidol University Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Institut Bergonie Instituto Estadual de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcanti Universidade Federal do Parana Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust Universitatsklinikum Jena und Medizinische Fakultat Royal Adelaide Hospital Novartis International AG Novartis Pharmaceuticals University of Chicago University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center |
Keywords: | Medicine |
Issue Date: | 17-Jun-2010 |
Citation: | New England Journal of Medicine. Vol.362, No.24 (2010), 2251-2259 |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Nilotinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL than imatinib. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib, as compared with imatinib, in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study, we assigned 846 patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nilotinib (at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily) or imatinib (at a dose of 400 mg once daily). The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rates of major molecular response for nilotinib (44% for the 300-mg dose and 43% for the 400-mg dose) were nearly twice that for imatinib (22%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months were significantly higher for nilotinib (80% for the 300-mg dose and 78% for the 400-mg dose) than for imatinib (65%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients receiving either the 300-mg dose or the 400-mg dose of nilotinib twice daily had a significant improvement in the time to progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, as compared with those receiving imatinib (P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively). No patient with progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis had a major molecular response. Gastrointestinal and fluid-retention events were more frequent among patients receiving imatinib, whereas dermatologic events and headache were more frequent in those receiving nilotinib. Discontinuations due to aminotransferase and bilirubin elevations were low in all three study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nilotinib at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily was superior to imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00471497.) Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. |
URI: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953691179&origin=inward http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/29624 |
ISSN: | 15334406 00284793 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus 2006-2010 |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.