Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34313
Title: Use of the i2b2 research query tool to conduct a matched case-control clinical research study: Advantages, disadvantages and methodological considerations
Authors: Emilie K. Johnson
Sarabeth Broder-Fingert
Pornthep Tanpowpong
Jonathan Bickel
Jenifer R. Lightdale
Caleb P. Nelson
Children's Hospital Boston
Harvard-wide Pediatric Health Services Research Fellowship
Massachusetts General Hospital
Mahidol University
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 30-Jan-2014
Citation: BMC Medical Research Methodology. Vol.14, No.1 (2014)
Abstract: Background: A major aim of the i2b2 (informatics for integrating biology and the bedside) clinical data informatics framework aims to create an efficient structure within which patients can be identified for clinical and translational research projects. Our objective was to describe the respective roles of the i2b2 research query tool and the electronic medical record (EMR) in conducting a case-controlled clinical study at our institution. Methods. We analyzed the process of using i2b2 and the EMR together to generate a complete research database for a case-control study that sought to examine risk factors for kidney stones among gastrostomy tube (G-tube) fed children. Results: Our final case cohort consisted of 41/177 (23%) of potential cases initially identified by i2b2, who were matched with 80/486 (17%) of potential controls. Cases were 10 times more likely to be excluded for inaccurate coding regarding stones vs. inaccurate coding regarding G-tubes. A majority (67%) of cases were excluded due to not meeting clinical inclusion criteria, whereas a majority of control exclusions (72%) occurred due to inadequate clinical data necessary for study completion. Full dataset assembly required complementary information from i2b2 and the EMR. Conclusions: i2b2 was critical as a query analysis tool for patient identification in our case-control study. Patient identification via procedural coding appeared more accurate compared with diagnosis coding. Completion of our investigation required iterative interplay of i2b2 and the EMR to assemble the study cohort. © 2014 Johnson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84893159699&origin=inward
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34313
ISSN: 14712288
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2011-2015

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.