Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Do we need to do overcorrection in Blount's disease?|
|Citation:||International Orthopaedics. Vol.38, No.8 (2014), 1661-1664|
|Abstract:||Purpose: In order to prevent recurrent deformity, overcorrection in Blount's disease has been a common practice by most paediatric orthopaedic surgeons. However, some patients have persistent valgus alignment resulting in awkward deformity. The femoro-tibial angle (FTA) was measured in this series of cases to determine the necessity of such practice. Method: During 1998-2010, patients with Blount's disease stage 2 by Langenskiold, aged from 30 to 40 months who had failed from bracing and underwent valgus osteotomy were included. Seventeen legs had postoperative FTA 7-13° (group 1) and 48 legs had postoperative FTA more than 13° (group 2). ROC curve was used to determine the appropriate FTA that was suitable to prevent recurrence. Results: Four legs had recurrence (28.6 %) in group 1 and six legs (12.5 %) had recurrence in group 2. Chi-square test between two groups were not statistically significant in recurrence (p = 0.434). Age and BMI were not statistically significant between recurrent and non-recurrent groups. The ROC curve shows that overcorrection more than 15° did not show benefit to prevent the recurrence in Blount's stage 2. Conclusion: Our study showed that the overcorrection group had non-statistically significant recurrence compared to the non-overcorrection group, and overcorrection more than valgus 15° has no benefit to prevent recurrence. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.|
|Appears in Collections:||Scopus 2011-2015|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.