Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34685
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSherine G. Moftahen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarawut Sukkasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorEric J. Sternen_US
dc.contributor.otherAin Shams Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Washington, Seattleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T02:55:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-09T02:55:41Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationEgyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Vol.45, No.3 (2014), 695-703en_US
dc.identifier.issn20904762en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378603Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84905910443en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84905910443&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34685-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To demonstrate the spectrum of incidental findings on chest CT scans and to evaluate the clinical impact of significant different abnormalities on patient management. Materials and methods This retrospective study included incidental findings on chest CT scans from an adult patient population, performed at the University of Washington, within a 10 month period. After exclusion of repetitive findings, 113 patients (50 males and 63 females, age 18-96 years, mean = 57.3 years) demonstrated 163 uniquely different findings. We determined the clinical significance according to the need for further workup and/or therapy. The gold standard for diagnosis was either by pathologic proof, follow up CT, or other imaging modalities. Results 38 different findings were judged clinically significant (10.4%) requiring further workup and/or therapy in 9.6% and 7.1%, respectively. The anatomic site of disease was: intra-thoracic (n = 27, 71.1%), extra-thoracic (n = 5, 13.1%), lower neck (n = 3, 7.9%), and upper abdomen (n = 3, 7.9%). They included 12 unique malignant pathologies (31.6%), and 26 non-malignant findings (68.4%). Conclusion The clinically significant different incidental abnormalities on chest CT scans represented 10.4% of all incidental findings, 3.3% were due to malignancies. The clinical impact of incidental abnormalities on chest CT may be of utmost importance on patient care. © 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84905910443&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePatient-centered clinical impact of incidentally detected abnormalities on chest CT scansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.04.018en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2011-2015

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.