Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34839
Title: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole plus doxycycline as oral eradicative treatment for melioidosis (MERTH): A multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
Authors: Ploenchan Chetchotisakd
Wirongrong Chierakul
Wipada Chaowagul
Siriluck Anunnatsiri
Kriangsak Phimda
Piroon Mootsikapun
Seksan Chaisuksant
Jiraporn Pilaikul
Bandit Thinkhamrop
Sunchai Phiphitaporn
Wattanachai Susaengrat
Chalongchai Toondee
Surasakdi Wongrattanacheewin
Vanaporn Wuthiekanun
Narisara Chantratita
Janjira Thaipadungpanit
Nicholas P. Day
Direk Limmathurotsakul
Sharon J. Peacock
Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University
Kaen University
Mahidol University
Sappasitthiprasong Hospital
Udon Thani Center Hospital
Khon Kaen Regional Hospital
Mahasarakam Hospital
Khon Kaen University
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2014
Citation: The Lancet. Vol.383, No.9919 (2014), 807-814
Abstract: Background Melioidosis, an infectious disease caused by the Gram-negative bacillus Burkholderia pseudomallei, is difficult to cure. Antimicrobial treatment comprises intravenous drugs for at least 10 days, followed by oral drugs for at least 12 weeks. The standard oral regimen based on trial evidence is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxaxole (TMP-SMX) plus doxycycline. This regimen is used in Thailand but is associated with side-effects and poor adherence by patients, and TMP-SMX alone is recommended in Australia. We compared the efficacy and side-effects of TMP-SMX with TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for the oral phase of melioidosis treatment. Methods For this multi-centre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled patients (aged ≥15 years) from five centres in northeast Thailand with culture-confirmed melioidosis who had received a course of parenteral antimicrobial drugs. Using a computer-generated sequence, we randomly assigned patients to receive TMP-SMX plus placebo or TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for 20 weeks (1:1; block size of ten, stratified by study site). We followed patients up every 4 months for 1 year and annually thereafter to the end of the study. The primary endpoint was culture-confirmed recurrent melioidosis, and the non-inferiority margin was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.7. This study is registered with www.controlled-trials. com, number ISRCTN86140460. Findings We enrolled and randomly assigned 626 patients: 311 to TMP-SMX plus placebo and 315 to TMP-SMX plus doxycycline. 16 patients (5%) in the TMP-SMX plus placebo group and 21 patients (7%) in the TMP-SMX plus doxycycline group developed culture-confirmed recurrent melioidosis (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.42-1.55). The criterion for non-inferiority was met (p=0.01). Adverse drug reactions were less common in the TMP-SMX plus placebo group than in the TMP-SMX plus doxycycline group (122 [39%] vs 167 [53%]). Interpretation Our findings suggest that TMP-SMX is not inferior to TMP-SMX plus doxycycline for the oral phase of melioidosis treatment, and is preferable on the basis of safety and tolerance by patients.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896740323&origin=inward
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/34839
ISSN: 1474547X
01406736
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2011-2015

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.