Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/36420
Title: Faster pediatric 3-T abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between conventional and variable refocusing flip-angle single-shot fast spin-echo sequences
Authors: Nichanan Ruangwattanapaisarn
Andreas M. Loening
Manojkumar Saranathan
Daniel V. Litwiller
Shreyas S. Vasanawala
Mahidol University
Stanford University
GE Healthcare, UK
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2015
Citation: Pediatric Radiology. Vol.45, No.6 (2015), 847-854
Abstract: © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Background: Single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) is particularly appealing in pediatric patients because of its motion robustness. However radiofrequency energy deposition at 3 tesla forces long pauses between slices, leading to longer scans, longer breath-holds and more between-slice motion. Objective: We sought to learn whether modulation of the SSFSE refocusing flip-angle train could reduce radiofrequency energy deposition without degrading image quality, thereby reducing inter-slice pauses and overall scan times. Materials and methods: We modulated the refocusing flip-angle train for SSFSE to minimize energy deposition while minimizing blurring and motion-related signal loss. In a cohort of 50 consecutive patients (25 boys, mean age 5.5 years, range 1 month to 17 years) referred for abdominal MRI we obtained standard SSFSE and variable refocusing flip-angle (vrfSSFSE) images and recorded sequence scan times. Two readers independently scored the images in blinded, randomized order for noise, tissue contrast, sharpness, artifacts and left lobe hepatic signal uniformity on a four-point scale. The null hypothesis of no difference between SSFSE and vrfSSFSE image-quality was assessed with a Mann–Whitney U test, and the null hypothesis of no scan time difference was assessed with the paired t-test. Results: SSFSE and vrfSSFSE mean acquisition times were 54.3 and 26.2 s, respectively (P-value <0.0001). For each reader, SSFSE and vrfSSFSE noise, tissue contrast, sharpness and artifacts were not significantly different (P-values 0.18–0.86). However, SSFSE had better left lobe hepatic signal uniformity (P < 0.01, both readers). Conclusion: vrfSSFSE is twice as fast as SSFSE, with equivalent image quality with the exception of left hepatic lobe signal heterogeneity.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930089182&origin=inward
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/36420
ISSN: 14321998
03010449
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2011-2015

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.