Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/40657
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPompon Sanpanyawaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSamroeng Inglamen_US
dc.contributor.authorEkachai Chaichanasirien_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:50:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:01:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:50:36Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:01:32Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationIECBES 2016 - IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences. (2016), 669-673en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85015642593en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85015642593&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/40657-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 IEEE. All-on-four oral rehabilitation by placing 2 tilted splint with 2 normal angulation implants, is one of an effective treatment but operator's experience are more required. Using short implant (not greater than 6 mm.) instead of tilted implant placement may interest. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical performances of short implant for supporting fixed prosthesis in edentulous maxilla. Finite element models were designed into 3 conditions. In anterior region, two 4.1×8 mm. implants were used. In posterior region, a couple of short implant (4.1×6 mm. and 4.8×6 mm.) were used in condition 1 and 2, respectively. While condition 3 (original All-on-four) 2 pieces of 4.1×8 mm. implant were placed with 30° angulation. Both axial and oblique loading directions were applied with a magnitude of 150 N. at the first molar area. Strain, stress, strain energy density (SED), and implant displacement were evaluated. Results revealed that the strain, stress, and displacement from each condition were not greater than 4000 microstrains (bone's maximum strain value before resorption), 104 MPa (bone's yield strength), and 5 micrometers (physiologic movement of implant), respectively. The results indicated that marginal bone would not be affected. The application of short implant could safe to the bone in biomechanical aspect.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85015642593&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.title3D finite element study of biomechanical performances of short implant supporting fixed prosthesisen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/IECBES.2016.7843534en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2016-2017

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.