Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/43053
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSitthichai Wanachantararaken_US
dc.contributor.authorOrapin Ajcharanukulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNoppakun Vongsavanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruce Matthewsen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Bristol, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:15:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:04:07Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:15:04Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:04:07Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Oral Biology. Vol.66, (2016), 120-128en_US
dc.identifier.issn18791506en_US
dc.identifier.issn00039969en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84959513991en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959513991&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/43053-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Objective To determine if dentine at the enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) in man is more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure stimuli then deeper dentine. Design Cavities (1 mm diam.) were cut at the tips of the buccal and lingual cusps of 8 premolars in 3 subjects (ages: 22-25 years). Both cavities were initially deepened to expose the EDJ then one (the test cavity) was deepened in steps of 0.5 mm to a maximum of 2.0 mm below the EDJ. The cavities were tested at each stage, before and after etching, with 5 s, hydrostatic pressure stimuli between 400 mm above, and 400 mm below atmospheric. The intensity of any pain produced was recorded on a VAS scale and electrodes were placed in both cavities in an attempt to monitor any action potentials evoked in intradental nerves. Results In all the teeth, the intensity of the pain produced by a stimulus tended to increase as the cavity was deepened, as did the number of action potentials recorded (in 6 of the 8 teeth). The responses were greater from etched than unetched dentine, and negative pressures evoked greater responses than the corresponding positive pressures. Conclusion There was no evidence that dentine close to the EDJ was more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure stimuli than deeper dentine. It may however be more sensitive to mechanical stimuli as it is more compliant.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959513991&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleEffect of cavity depth on dentine sensitivity in manen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.02.015en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2016-2017

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.