Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Salty stories, fresh spaces: Lessons for aquatic protected areas from marine and freshwater experiences
Authors: Erin K. Loury
Shaara M. Ainsley
Shannon D. Bower
Ratana Chuenpagdee
Tracy Farrell
Amanda G. Guthrie
Sokrith Heng
Zau Lunn
Abdullah Al Mamun
Rodrigo Oyanedel
Steve Rocliffe
Suvaluck Satumanatpan
Steven J. Cooke
Fauna & Flora International
Michigan State University
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Carleton University
Mahidol University
Wilfrid Laurier University
Blue Ventures Conservation
Conservation International
Keywords: Agricultural and Biological Sciences;Environmental Science
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2018
Citation: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Vol.28, No.2 (2018), 485-500
Abstract: Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Marine protected areas (MPAs) and freshwater protected areas (FPAs), collectively aquatic protected areas (APAs), share many commonalities in their design, establishment, and management, suggesting great potential for sharing lessons learned. However, surprisingly little has been exchanged to date, and both realms of inquiry and practice have progressed mostly independent of each other. This paper builds on a session held at the 7th World Fisheries Congress in Busan, South Korea, in May 2016, which explored crossover lessons between marine and freshwater realms, and included case studies of four MPAs and five FPAs (or clusters of FPAs) from nine countries. This review uses the case studies to explore similarities, differences, and transferrable lessons between MPAs and FPAs under five themes: (1) ecological system; (2) establishment approaches; (3) effectiveness monitoring; (4) sustaining APAs; and (5) challenges and external threats. Ecological differences between marine and freshwater environments may necessitate different approaches for collecting species and habitat data to inform APA design, establishment and monitoring, but once collected, similar spatial ecological tools can be applied in both realms. In contrast, many similarities exist in the human dimension of both MPA and FPA establishment and management, highlighting clear opportunities for exchanging lessons related to stakeholder engagement and support, and for using similar socio-economic and governance assessment methods to address data gaps in both realms. Regions that implement MPAs and FPAs could work together to address shared challenges, such as developing mechanisms for diversified and sustained funding, and employing integrated coastal/watershed management to address system-level threats. Collaboration across realms could facilitate conservation of diadromous species in both marine and freshwater habitats. Continued exchange and increased collaboration would benefit both realms, and may be facilitated by defining shared terminology, holding cross-disciplinary conferences or sessions, publishing inclusive papers, and proposing joint projects.
ISSN: 10990755
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2018

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.