Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErin K. Louryen_US
dc.contributor.authorShaara M. Ainsleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorShannon D. Boweren_US
dc.contributor.authorRatana Chuenpagdeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorTracy Farrellen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmanda G. Guthrieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSokrith Hengen_US
dc.contributor.authorZau Lunnen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdullah Al Mamunen_US
dc.contributor.authorRodrigo Oyanedelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteve Rocliffeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuvaluck Satumanatpanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteven J. Cookeen_US
dc.contributor.otherFauna & Flora Internationalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMichigan State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPontificia Universidad Católica de Chileen_US
dc.contributor.otherMemorial University of Newfoundlanden_US
dc.contributor.otherCarleton Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherWilfrid Laurier Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBlue Ventures Conservationen_US
dc.contributor.otherConservation Internationalen_US
dc.identifier.citationAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. Vol.28, No.2 (2018), 485-500en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Marine protected areas (MPAs) and freshwater protected areas (FPAs), collectively aquatic protected areas (APAs), share many commonalities in their design, establishment, and management, suggesting great potential for sharing lessons learned. However, surprisingly little has been exchanged to date, and both realms of inquiry and practice have progressed mostly independent of each other. This paper builds on a session held at the 7th World Fisheries Congress in Busan, South Korea, in May 2016, which explored crossover lessons between marine and freshwater realms, and included case studies of four MPAs and five FPAs (or clusters of FPAs) from nine countries. This review uses the case studies to explore similarities, differences, and transferrable lessons between MPAs and FPAs under five themes: (1) ecological system; (2) establishment approaches; (3) effectiveness monitoring; (4) sustaining APAs; and (5) challenges and external threats. Ecological differences between marine and freshwater environments may necessitate different approaches for collecting species and habitat data to inform APA design, establishment and monitoring, but once collected, similar spatial ecological tools can be applied in both realms. In contrast, many similarities exist in the human dimension of both MPA and FPA establishment and management, highlighting clear opportunities for exchanging lessons related to stakeholder engagement and support, and for using similar socio-economic and governance assessment methods to address data gaps in both realms. Regions that implement MPAs and FPAs could work together to address shared challenges, such as developing mechanisms for diversified and sustained funding, and employing integrated coastal/watershed management to address system-level threats. Collaboration across realms could facilitate conservation of diadromous species in both marine and freshwater habitats. Continued exchange and increased collaboration would benefit both realms, and may be facilitated by defining shared terminology, holding cross-disciplinary conferences or sessions, publishing inclusive papers, and proposing joint projects.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleSalty stories, fresh spaces: Lessons for aquatic protected areas from marine and freshwater experiencesen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2018

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.