Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/45760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDwi Endartien_US
dc.contributor.authorArthorn Riewpaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorMontarat Thavorncharoensapen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaiyana Praditsitthikornen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaymond Hutubessyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSusi Ari Kristinaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitas Gadjah Madaen_US
dc.contributor.otherOrganisation Mondiale de la Santéen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:03:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:03:09Z-
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationValue in Health Regional Issues. Vol.15, (2018), 50-55en_US
dc.identifier.issn22121102en_US
dc.identifier.issn22121099en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85028499109en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028499109&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/45760-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Objectives To gain insight into the most suitable foreign value set among Malaysian, Singaporean, Thai, and UK value sets for calculating the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire index score (utility) among patients with cervical cancer in Indonesia. Methods Data from 87 patients with cervical cancer recruited from a referral hospital in Yogyakarta province, Indonesia, from an earlier study of health-related quality of life were used in this study. The differences among the utility scores derived from the four value sets were determined using the Friedman test. Performance of the psychometric properties of the four value sets versus visual analogue scale (VAS) was assessed. Intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to test the agreement among the utility scores. Spearman ρ correlation coefficients were used to assess convergent validity between utility scores and patients’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. With respect to known-group validity, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine the differences in utility according to the stages of cancer. Results There was significant difference among utility scores derived from the four value sets, among which the Malaysian value set yielded higher utility than the other three value sets. Utility obtained from the Malaysian value set had more agreements with VAS than the other value sets versus VAS (intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plot tests results). As for the validity, the four value sets showed equivalent psychometric properties as those that resulted from convergent and known-group validity tests. Conclusions In the absence of an Indonesian value set, the Malaysian value set was more preferable to be used compared with the other value sets. Further studies on the development of an Indonesian value set need to be conducted.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85028499109&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of EQ-5D-3L Index Scores Using Malaysian, Singaporean, Thai, and UK Value Sets in Indonesian Cervical Cancer Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vhri.2017.07.008en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2018

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.