Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/46951
Title: Characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation prescribed antiplatelet monotherapy compared with those on anticoagulants: Insights from the GARFIELD-AF registry
Authors: Freek W.A. Verheugt
Haiyan Gao
Wael Al Mahmeed
Giuseppe Ambrosio
Pantep Angchaisuksiri
Dan Atar
Jean Pierre Bassand
A. John Camm
Frank Cools
John Eikelboom
Gloria Kayani
Toon Wei Lim
Frank Misselwitz
Karen S. Pieper
Martin Van Eickels
Ajay K. Kakkar
National University Health System
Bayer Pharma AG
Population Health Research Institute, Ontario
Ulleval University Hospital
Universite de Franche-Comte
Duke Clinical Research Institute
St George's University of London
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Klina
Our Lady Hospital - Amsterdam
UCL
Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Thrombosis Research Institute
Bayer AG
Università degli Studi di Perugia
Keywords: Medicine
Issue Date: 7-Feb-2018
Citation: European Heart Journal. Vol.39, No.6 (2018), 464-473
Abstract: © The Author 2017. Aims Current atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines discourage antiplatelet (AP) monotherapy as alternative to anticoagulants (ACs). Why AP only is still used is largely unknown. Methods and results Factors associated with AP monotherapy prescription were analysed in GARFIELD-AF, a registry of patients with newly diagnosed (6 weeks) AF and 1 investigator-determined stroke risk factor. We analysed 51 270 patients from 35 countries enrolled into five sequential cohorts between 2010 and 2016. Overall, 20.7% of patients received AP monotherapy, 52.1% AC monotherapy, and 14.1% AP AC. Most AP monotherapy (82.5%) and AC monotherapy (86.8%) patients were CHA2DS2-VASc 2. Compared with patients on AC monotherapy, AP monotherapy patients were frequently Chinese (vs. Caucasian, odds ratio 2.73) and more likely to have persistent AF (1.32), history of coronary artery disease (2.41) or other vascular disease (1.67), bleeding (2.11), or dementia (1.81). The odds for AP monotherapy increased with 5 years of age increments for patients 75 years (1.24) but decreased with age increments for patients 55-75 years (0.86). Antiplatelet monotherapy patients were less likely to have paroxysmal (0.67) or permanent AF (0.57), history of embolism (0.56), or alcohol use (0.90). With each cohort, AP monotherapy declined (P 0.0001), especially non-indicated use. AP AC and no antithrombotic therapy were unchanged. However, even in 2015 and 2016, about 50% of AP-Treated patients had no indication except AF (71% were CHA2DS2-VASc 2). Conclusion Prescribing AP monotherapy in newly diagnosed AF has declined, but even nowadays a substantial proportion of AP-Treated patients with AF have no indication for AP. All rights reserved.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042516795&origin=inward
http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/46951
ISSN: 15229645
0195668X
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2018

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.