Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/47253
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnthony Y.B. Teohen_US
dc.contributor.authorVinay Dhiren_US
dc.contributor.authorMitsuhiro Kidaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIchiro Yasudaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhen Dong Jinen_US
dc.contributor.authorDong Wan Seoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMajid Almadien_US
dc.contributor.authorTiing Leong Angen_US
dc.contributor.authorKazuo Haraen_US
dc.contributor.authorIda Hilmien_US
dc.contributor.authorTakao Itoien_US
dc.contributor.authorSundeep Lakhtakiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoji Matsudaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNonthalee Pausawasdien_US
dc.contributor.authorRajesh Purien_US
dc.contributor.authorRaymond S. Tangen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsiu Po Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorAi Ming Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert Hawesen_US
dc.contributor.authorShyam Varadarajuluen_US
dc.contributor.authorKenjiro Yasudaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLawrence Khek Yu Hoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedanta Institute of Digestive & Hepatobiliary Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherChanghai Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherAsan Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Khalid University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malayaen_US
dc.contributor.otherAichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherTeikyo Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Taiwan University College of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Wales Hospital Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherKitasato University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational University of Singaporeen_US
dc.contributor.otherAsian Institute of Gastroenterology Indiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFlorida Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherChangi General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSt. Marianna University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPeking Union Medical Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherKyoto Daini Sekijyuji Byoinen_US
dc.contributor.otherTokyo Medical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBaldota Institute of Digestive Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:40:58Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:40:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGut. Vol.67, No.7 (2018), 1209-1228en_US
dc.identifier.issn14683288en_US
dc.identifier.issn00175749en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85050201620en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050201620&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/47253-
dc.description.abstract© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. Objectives: Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures are gaining popularity and the most commonly performed procedures include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage and EUSguided celiac plexus ablation. The aim of this paper is to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of the above procedures. Methods: Formulation of the guidelines was based on the best scientific evidence available. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology (RAM) was used. Panellists recruited comprised experts in surgery, interventional EUS, interventional radiology and oncology from 11 countries. Between June 2014 and October 2016, the panellists met in meetings to discuss and vote on the clinical scenarios for each of the interventional EUS procedures in question. Results: A total of 15 statements on EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst, 15 statements on EUS-guided biliary drainage, 12 statements on EUSguided pancreatic duct drainage and 14 statements on EUS-guided celiac plexus ablation were formulated. The statements addressed the indications for the procedures, technical aspects, pre- and post-procedural management, management of complications, and competency and training in the procedures. All statements except one were found to be appropriate. Randomised studies to address clinical questions in a number of aspects of the procedures are urgently required. Conclusions: The current guidelines on interventional EUS procedures are the first published by an endoscopic society. These guidelines provide an in-depth review of the current evidence and standardise the management of the procedures.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050201620&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleConsensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: Results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panelen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314341en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2018

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.