Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/49910
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaranit Kaewkungwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorPornpimon Adamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorJetsumon Sattabongkoten_US
dc.contributor.authorReidar K. Lieen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid Wendleren_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitetet i Bergenen_US
dc.contributor.otherNIH Clinical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:30:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:30:27Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.10 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85073119777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/49910-
dc.description.abstractThis is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Questions have been raised over the acceptability of conducting human challenge studies in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Most of these concerns are based on theoretical considerations and there exists little data on the attitudes of stakeholders in these countries. This study examines the view of researchers and REC members in Thailand regarding the design and conduct of challenge studies in the country. A questionnaire was developed based on ethical frameworks for human challenge studies. The target respondents included those who had experience with health-related research at universities, non-university hospitals, and research institutes. A total of 240 respondents completed the on-line survey. In general, the respondents felt that the ethical issues raised by human challenge studies in LMICS do not differ significantly from those in high income countries, including: scientific rationale, safety, appropriate risks, and robust informed consent process. In contrast, issues that have been described as important for human challenge studies in LMICs were rated as having lower importance, including: a publicly available rationale, national priority, and community engagement. Responses did not vary significantly between researchers in different fields, nor between researchers and REC members. These findings provide an important perspective for assessing existing frameworks for human challenges studies in LMICs.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073119777&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleConducting human challenge studies in LMICs: A survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailanden_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0223619en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073119777&origin=inwarden_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2019

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.