Simple jQuery Dropdowns
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/61744
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnchalee Churojanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorIttichai Sakarunchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorThaweesak Aurboonyawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorEkawut Chankaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattarawit Withayasuken_US
dc.contributor.authorBoonrerk Sangpetngamen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T04:09:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-24T04:09:52Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationWorld Neurosurgery. Vol.146, (2021), e53-e66en_US
dc.identifier.issn18788769en_US
dc.identifier.issn18788750en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85097678952en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/61744-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Background: The principles of endovascular treatment of bilateral cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CS-dAVF) are not well established because of the complexity in the number of fistula tracts and their behavior, which seems to be more aggressive. We aimed to determine an efficient technique for endovascular treatment of bilateral CS-dAVF and the associated factors to achieve good clinical and angiographic outcomes. Methods: The data were analyzed from 165 consecutive patients diagnosed with CS-dAVF from January 2005 to September 2018. The demographic data included approaching route, embolization times, embolization material, sequence of embolization, number of embolization sessions, and angiographic and clinical outcomes. Interrater agreement of bilateral CS-dAVF diagnosis was performed using the κ coefficient. The factors associated with treatment outcome were analyzed using a Pearson χ2 test. Results: Bilateral CS-dAVF was detected in 43 patients (26%). Angiographic presentations that showed evidence of sinus thrombosis, dangerous venous drainage, and higher Satomi classification were more commonly found in bilateral CS-dAVF than in unilateral CS-dAVF. Good clinical outcome and cure from angiography were obtained in 90% and 74%, respectively. Ipsilateral inferior petrosal sinus–intercavernous sinus–contralateral cavernous sinus catheterization was the major approach route of treatment. The factors associated with improved clinical outcome were transvenous approach, shunt closure, coil embolization, and sequencing the embolization (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Dangerous venous drainage tends to increase in bilateral CS-dAVF. Retrograde ipsilateral inferior petrosal sinus catheterization using coil embolization and sequencing the embolization are the major concerns for treatment.en_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097678952&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficiency of Endovascular Therapy for Bilateral Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistulaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.001en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097678952&origin=inwarden_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus 2021

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.