Reflecting on Criticisms of Positive Psychology: A Rebalancing Act
Issued Date
2022-01-01
Resource Type
eISSN
26511762
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-105043642192
Journal Title
Human Behavior Development and Society
Volume
23
Issue
1
Start Page
50
End Page
58
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Human Behavior Development and Society Vol.23 No.1 (2022) , 50-58
Suggested Citation
Rhein D., McDonald I. Reflecting on Criticisms of Positive Psychology: A Rebalancing Act. Human Behavior Development and Society Vol.23 No.1 (2022) , 50-58. 58. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/117905
Title
Reflecting on Criticisms of Positive Psychology: A Rebalancing Act
Author(s)
Author's Affiliation
Corresponding Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The field of positive psychology has grown and spread quickly. Unsurprisingly, such rapid growth has led to some confusion about what, exactly, positive psychology is. Positive psychology has also attracted a number of critics who have questioned its necessity, validity, and relevance to non-Western cultures. This article presents these criticisms and responds to each of them. Instead of being seen as a separate field, the authors argue that positive psychology is best viewed as a rebalancing of psychology’s focus as a whole. The article examines the immediate and powerful impact that ideas and practices from positive psychology have had on individuals, schools, organizations, and nations. The authors suggest that such quick and ready acceptance of positive psychology’s core ideas and practices reflects the presence of a pre-existing imbalance within the field of psychology and calls for a more correct understanding of what is meant by a positive psychology. The article concludes by arguing that the study of flourishing should not be viewed as a new field of psychology. Instead, it should be seen as a complement to existing psychological theory and practice, with the result being a more holistic understanding of what it means to be human.