Fatima S. MatarDean WilkinsonJeremy DavisGiordano BiasiTrent CauserIolanda FuduliOwen J. BraceNauljun StansookMartin CarolanAnatoly B. RosenfeldMarco PetaseccaMahidol UniversityUniversity of WollongongWollongong HospitalIHMRI2020-08-252020-08-252020-01-01Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. (2020)152699142-s2.0-85088145688https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58314© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. In the article cited above, clarifications have been made in three places as listed below. Introduction, lines 21-22: The phrase “examined the coordination between GS and relative dose profiles” Has been changed to “studied the dose control and GS” Introduction, lines 26–27: The phrase “Further, the measured parameters were not evaluated as a function of gantry angle” Has been changed to “The relative dose and GS were evaluated as a function of gantry angle” Section 2C. Mutual dependence of dose rate and gantry speed, lines 1–2: The sentence “The mutual dependence of DR and GS during VMAT deliveries was investigated with the use of the Customer Acceptance Plan (CAP).” Has been changed to “The mutual dependence of DR and GS during VMAT deliveries was investigated with the DUO system using the method Barnes et al [9] applied to the Customer Acceptance Plan (CAP).”.Mahidol UniversityMedicinePhysics and AstronomyErratumSCOPUS10.1002/acm2.12967