Simmaly PhongmanyRattanaphone PhetsouvanhSiho SisouphoneChirapha DarasavathPankham VongphachaneOudayvone RattanavongMayfong MayxayAndrew C. RamsayStuart D. BlacksellChanpheng ThammavongBounkong SyhavongNicholas J. WhitePaul N. NewtonMahosot HospitalNational University of LaosMahidol UniversityChurchill Hospital2018-06-212018-06-212005-06-01Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.99, No.6 (2005), 451-458003592032-s2.0-20244365960https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16582We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50 mg/kg/ day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range) of 8 (2-30) days. All Salmonella enterica serotype typhi isolates were nalidixic acid-sensitive, four (8%) were chloramphenicol-resistant and three (6%) were multidrug-resistant. Median (range) fever clearance times were 90 (24-224) hours in the chloramphenicol group and 54 (6-93) hours in the ofloxacin group (P < 0.001). One patient in the chloramphenicol group developed an ileal perforation. Three days ofloxacin was more effective than 14 days chloramphenicol for the in-patient treatment of typhoid fever, irrespective of antibiotic susceptibility, and was of similar cost. © 2004 Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Mahidol UniversityImmunology and MicrobiologyMedicineA randomized comparison of oral chloramphenicol versus ofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in LaosArticleSCOPUS10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.08.007