Rung‐Arunwan T.Siripunvaraporn W.Utada H.Mahidol University2023-12-082023-12-082023-12-01Earth, Planets and Space Vol.75 No.1 (2023)13438832https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/91303In the version of this article that was originally published (Rung-Arunwan et al. 2022), there were errors in the captions of Figs. 9, 10, 11, and 12. The caption of Fig. 9 should have been: “Data RMS misfits and the model recovery factors of the inverted models shown in Fig. 8 obtained by inverting PTATAN (black), ZLOGA (red), and ZLOGO (blue).” The caption of Fig. 10 should have been: “NS cross-sections at the easting of 200 m of the models inverted from all elements of the distorted MT impedance tensor (ZLOGA) using different initial models.” The caption of Fig. 11 should have been: “NS cross-sections at the easting of 200 m of the models inverted from the off-diagonal elements (ZLOGO) of the distorted MT impedance tensor using differential initial models.” The caption of Fig. 12 should have been: “Data RMS misfits and the model recovery factors for different initial (prior) models obtained from inverting a all elements (ZLOGA) and b off-diagonal elements (ZLOGO) of the distorted MT impedance tensor. Orange, red, and blue curves correspond to three different levels of distortion, as represented by SD = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5, respectively.” The authors apologise for these errors. The original article (Rung-Arunwan et al. 2022) has been updated.Earth and Planetary SciencesErratumSCOPUS10.1186/s40623-023-01922-42-s2.0-8517780232018805981