Amphan ChalermchockchareonkitPutthawan TekasakulPongsakdi ChaisilwattanaKorakot SirimaiNoraziana WahabMahidol UniversityInternational Islamic University Malaysia2018-06-112018-06-112012-01-01International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol.116, No.2 (2012), 109-11118793479002072922-s2.0-84355166519https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/15071Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) versus abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in patients with severe pelvic endometriosis. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis was conducted between January 2002 and December 2007. A total of 503 patients had severe pelvic endometriosis; of these, 115 patients underwent LH and 388 patients underwent AH. Surgical outcomes-including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and need for blood transfusion-were analyzed and compared between the 2 treatment groups. Results: Operative time was significantly longer for LH than for AH (185.1 ± 48.7 minutes and 139.9 ± 52.4 minutes, respectively; P < 0.001). However, estimated volume of blood loss, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were significantly less for patients in the LH group than for those in the AH group (302.6 ± 255.1 mL versus 760.9 ± 633.2 mL [P < 0.001]; 3.5 ± 1.1 days versus 6.4 ± 3.0 days [P < 0.001]; and 18.3% versus 49.0% [P < 0.001], respectively). Conclusion: Compared with AH, LH was associated with fewer complications. LH should, therefore, be the preferred surgical option for women with severe pelvic endometriosis who require a hysterectomy. © 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.Mahidol UniversityMedicineArticleSCOPUS10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.022