David E. MuenchAndre OlssonKyle FerchenGiang PhamRachel A. SerafinSomchai ChutipongtanatePankaj DwivediBaobao SongStuart HayKashish ChetalLisa R. Trump-DurbinJayati Mookerjee-BasuKejian ZhangJennifer C. YuCarolyn LutzkoKasiani C. MyersKristopher L. NazorKenneth D. GreisDietmar J. KappesSing Sing WayNathan SalomonisH. Leighton GrimesBioLegend, Inc.University of California, San DiegoCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterUniversity of CincinnatiFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityFox Chase Cancer CenterRady Children's Hospital2020-06-022020-06-022020-01-01Nature. (2020)14764687002808362-s2.0-85084063089https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/56367© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited. Advances in genetics and sequencing have identified a plethora of disease-associated and disease-causing genetic alterations. To determine causality between genetics and disease, accurate models for molecular dissection are required; however, the rapid expansion of transcriptional populations identified through single-cell analyses presents a major challenge for accurate comparisons between mutant and wild-type cells. Here we generate mouse models of human severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) using patient-derived mutations in the GFI1 transcription factor. To determine the effects of SCN mutations, we generated single-cell references for granulopoietic genomic states with linked epitopes1, aligned mutant cells to their wild-type equivalents and identified differentially expressed genes and epigenetic loci. We find that GFI1-target genes are altered sequentially, as cells go through successive states of differentiation. These insights facilitated the genetic rescue of granulocytic specification but not post-commitment defects in innate immune effector function, and underscore the importance of evaluating the effects of mutations and therapy within each relevant cell state.Mahidol UniversityMultidisciplinaryMouse models of neutropenia reveal progenitor-stage-specific defectsArticleSCOPUS10.1038/s41586-020-2227-7