Pornpen SrisawasdiSomlak VanavananMana RochanawutanonKhanat KruthkulKazuhiko KotaniMartin H. KrollMahidol UniversityJichi Medical UniversityQuest Diagnostics2018-11-232018-11-232015-05-01Clinical Biochemistry. Vol.48, No.7-8 (2015), 495-50218732933000991202-s2.0-84939950355https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35462© 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Objective: Heterogeneous particles of intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) vary in atherogenesis. We investigated the association between the metabolic syndrome (MetS) score and lipoprotein subclasses. Design and methods: A total of 260 outpatients were scored into six groups, based on their number of MetS components. Lipoprotein subclass determined by polyacrylamide tube gel electrophoresis separates IDL particles into three midbands (MID-A to C) and LDL into larger-buoyant (LDL1 and LDL2) and small-dense LDL (LDL3 to LDL6). Results: Mean concentrations of VLDL, MIDC, LDL2, and LDL3 to LDL6 positively correlated with increasing MetS score, but those of MIDA, LDL1 and HDL-C inversely correlated. LDL2 and LDL3 to LDL6 increased while MIDA and LDL1 decreased with increasing visceral fat, HOMA-IR, and triglycerides, with a reverse pattern for HDL-C. MIDB and MIDC were unchanged. By logistic regression, LDL1 and LDL3 to LDL6 significantly associates with the MetS score (odds ratio. =. 0.957 and 1.077, respectively). The ratio of (LDL3 to LDL6)/LDL1 in the presence of HDL-C, showed the strongest association with MetS. Conclusions: Respective subpopulations of IDL and LDL particles can vary in their ability to identify MetS. Because of the most strongly associated with MetS, (LDL3 to LDL6)/LDL1 ratio is proposed as an excellent marker for evaluating lipid metabolic status in patient with MetS.Mahidol UniversityBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyArticleSCOPUS10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.01.011