J. P. EastwoodT. D. PhanP. A. CassakD. J. GershmanC. HaggertyK. MalakitM. A. ShayR. MistryM. ØierosetC. T. RussellJ. A. SlavinM. R. ArgallL. A. AvanovJ. L. BurchL. J. ChenJ. C. DorelliR. E. ErgunB. L. GilesY. KhotyaintsevB. LavraudP. A. LindqvistT. E. MooreR. NakamuraW. PatersonC. PollockR. J. StrangewayR. B. TorbertS. WangImperial College LondonSpace Sciences Laboratory at UC BerkeleyWest Virginia UniversityNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of MarylandUniversity of DelawareMahidol UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of Michigan, Ann ArborUniversity of New Hampshire DurhamSouthwest Research InstituteUniversity of Colorado at BoulderInstiutet för rymdfysikUniversite de ToulouseCNRS Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueThe Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)Institut fur WeltraumforschungDenali Scientific2018-12-112019-03-142018-12-112019-03-142016-01-01Geophysical Research Letters. Vol.43, No.10 (2016), 4716-472419448007009482762-s2.0-84970940019https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/43621©2016. The Authors. New Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) observations of small-scale (~7 ion inertial length radius) flux transfer events (FTEs) at the dayside magnetopause are reported. The 10 km MMS tetrahedron size enables their structure and properties to be calculated using a variety of multispacecraft techniques, allowing them to be identified as flux ropes, whose flux content is small (~22 kWb). The current density, calculated using plasma and magnetic field measurements independently, is found to be filamentary. Intercomparison of the plasma moments with electric and magnetic field measurements reveals structured non-frozen-in ion behavior. The data are further compared with a particle-in-cell simulation. It is concluded that these small-scale flux ropes, which are not seen to be growing, represent a distinct class of FTE which is generated on the magnetopause by secondary reconnection.Mahidol UniversityEarth and Planetary SciencesIon-scale secondary flux ropes generated by magnetopause reconnection as resolved by MMSArticleSCOPUS10.1002/2016GL068747