Anderson J.Boonyaves K.Okamoto H.Karaket N.Chuekong W.Garvie M.Chabang N.Osorio D.Supaibulwatana K.Mahidol University2026-06-022026-06-022026-06-01Precision Agriculture Vol.27 No.3 (2026)13852256https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/117063Purpose: Leaf chlorophyll content is a critical indicator of plant health. On-farm monitoring is limited by the high cost and accessibility of specialised meters and laboratory assays. This study evaluates a smartphone-based imaging method (PhotoFolia) as a practical, low-cost alternative for accurately estimating leaf SPAD (Soil and Plant Analysis Development) values and chlorophyll content. Methods: Image-based estimates from the PhotoFolia mobile application were validated against standard laboratory assays and SPAD-502+ meter readings. The validation was conducted across four commercial rice varieties cultivated in Thailand. Results: The smartphone imaging method predicted SPAD values with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.2 units and chlorophyll concentrations with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7.2% relative to laboratory benchmarks. Conclusion: With SPAD error approaching the industry ±1 unit standard and chlorophyll estimation remaining below a 10% relative error threshold, this approach demonstrates that ordinary mobile phones can serve as highly accessible, cost-effective tools for routine on-farm crop monitoring, eliminating the need for dedicated hardware. Highlights: Novel low-cost approach for chlorophyll assay and SPAD-value measurement using standard mobile phone. Achieves accuracy comparable to commercial tools. Eliminates need for specialised sensors or laboratory equipment. Impact: This study demonstrates that mobile phone-based image analysis can accurately estimate leaf SPAD and chlorophyll levels in rice under ambient lighting conditions, offering a low-cost, accessible tool for monitoring plant health.Agricultural and Biological SciencesImage-based leaf SPAD value and chlorophyll measurement using a mobile phone: enabling accessible and sustainable crop managementArticleSCOPUS10.1007/s11119-026-10386-x2-s2.0-10503987808915731618