Achirapa BandhayaNathinee PanvisavasMahidol University2018-07-122018-07-122008-08-01Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series. Vol.1, No.1 (2008), 9-10187517682-s2.0-50349085219https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/18877In human identification, the victim's toothbrush is an invaluable personal item as the deposited cellular material contains DNA from which a reference profile can be produced. The profile obtained then allows direct comparison to be made with the profile from the unidentified body. This study was undertaken to determine the minimum number of bristle bundles that would generate a complete DNA profile. The minimum period of usage for a toothbrush to retain enough cells for genotyping was also investigated. We also tested two commonly used DNA extraction methods: QIAamp®DNA Mini Kit and Chelex®100 to explore the efficiency of these protocols in recovering DNA from toothbrushes. In this experiment, volunteers brushed their teeth for 1, 7, 14, or 30 days. DNA was extracted from 5 and 10 bundles of bristles cut from the collected toothbrushes. The amount of DNA recovered was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR, and DNA genotyping was performed for each sample. Data revealed that QIAamp®DNA Mini Kit performed better at yielding DNA in terms of purity, quantity, and quality than Chelex®100. It was also found that, with a suitable method of recovery, DNA samples from five bundles of bristles from all of the toothbrushes generated complete profiles. Based on the experimental results, a general guideline concerning the appropriate extraction method and the quantity of the starting material for the analysis of DNA from toothbrushes could be suggested. © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.Mahidol UniversityBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyMedicineArticleSCOPUS10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.10.053