Ketkamon SangwichitRuksaphon KingkaewPong PongprueksaPisol SenawongseMahidol University2018-12-112019-03-142018-12-112019-03-142016-01-01Dental Materials Journal. Vol.35, No.3 (2016), 360-36818811361028745472-s2.0-84971443033https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/43614© 2016, Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices. All rights reserved. The objective was to compare bond strengths of adhesives with/without thermocycling and to analyze the micromorphology of resindentin interfaces. Flat dentin surfaces were prepared and divided into eight groups to bond with four etch-and-rinse adhesives (Optibond FL, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Optibond Solo Plus, and Single Bond 2) and four self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, Adper SE Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond and Adper Easy Bond). Specimens were further divided into two subgroups subjected for with/without thermocycling and then subjected to both micro-tensile test and resin-dentin interface evaluation. The results revealed that there were significant differences in bond strength between the groups with and without thermocycling for all etch-and-rinse groups and for the Adper Easy Bond self-etch group (p<0.01). Clearfil SE Bond demonstrated highly durable bond strengths. Furthermore, more silver ion uptake was observed at the resin-dentin interfaces for all etch-and-rinse adhesives and Adper SE Plus and Adper Easy Bond after thermocycling.Mahidol UniversityDentistryMaterials ScienceArticleSCOPUS10.4012/dmj.2015-253