Leena SuntornsukMahidol University2018-09-132018-09-132009-09-01Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. Vol.32, No.15 (2009), 2176-21921520572X108260762-s2.0-70449644819https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/27145Co- and counter-electroosmotic flow (EOF) capillary electrophoresis (CE) of anionic phenols, using UV and mass spectrometry (MS) detection were investigated. The co-EOF CE-UV detection was performed by using hexadimethrine bromide (HDB) as an EOF modifier, which provided the separation in 6.2min. The counter-EOF CE-MS was obtained without HDB and coupling was achieved by sheath liquid interface. The CE-UV provided the better linearity (r20.99) than the CE-MS (r20.81), however, both methods gave comparable detection limits (5g/mL). CE-UV is efficient for the routine quantitative analysis, whereas CE-MS is useful for identification of the phenols.Mahidol UniversityBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyChemistryPharmacology, Toxicology and PharmaceuticsCo- and counter-electroosmotic flow capillary electrophoresis of anionic phenols using UV and MS detectionArticleSCOPUS10.1080/10826070903163099