Darunee ChotiprasitsakulPranita D. TammaAvinash GadalaSara E. CosgroveFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityJohns Hopkins HospitalThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine2019-08-282019-08-282018-03-01Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. Vol.39, No.3 (2018), 290-296155968340899823X2-s2.0-85051358740https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46904© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. OBJECTIVES The role of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal surveillance swabs (nasal swabs) in guiding decisions about prescribing vancomycin is unclear. We aimed to determine the likelihood that patients with negative MRSA nasal swabs develop subsequent MRSA infections; to assess avoidable vancomycin days for patients with negative nasal swabs; and to identify risk factors for having a negative nasal swab and developing a MRSA infection during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 6 ICUs at a tertiary-care hospital from December 2013 through June 2015. The negative predictive value (NPV), defined as the ability of a negative nasal swab to predict no subsequent MRSA infection, was calculated. Days of vancomycin continued or restarted after 3 days from the collection time of the first negative nasal swab were determined. A matched case-control study identified risk factors for having a negative nasal swab and developing MRSA infection. RESULTS Of 11,441 patients with MRSA-negative nasal swabs, the rate of subsequent MRSA infection was 0.22%. A negative nasal swab had a NPV of 99.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.1%-99.6%). Vancomycin was continued or started after nasal swab results were available in 1,431 patients, translating to 7,364 vancomycin days. No risk factors associated with MRSA infection were identified. CONCLUSIONS In our hospital with a low prevalence of MRSA transmission, a negative MRSA nasal swab was helpful in identifying patients with low risk of MRSA infection in whom empiric vancomycin therapy could be stopped and in whom the subsequent initiation of vancomycin therapy during an ICU admission could be avoided.Mahidol UniversityMedicineConference PaperSCOPUS10.1017/ice.2017.308