Natthaporn WetwisitParanee VatanasomboonLakkhana TermsirikulchaiMahidol University. Faculty of Public Health2021-05-182021-05-182021-05-182012Journal of Public Health and Development. Vol. 10, No.2 (May-Aug 2012), 36-491905-1387https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/62210This quasi-experimental research - the pretest-posttest design with nonequivalent group aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of promotion intervention of cervical cancer screening test through woman-peer leaders. Respondents were women aged 30-60 years in Songphenong district, Suphanburi province. The 254 and 258 women in the responsible areas of Bangplab Subdistrict Health Center and that of Srisamrarn Subdistrict Health Center were assigned to experimental and comparison groups respectively. Target women in the experimental group received promotion intervention of cervical cancer screening test, delivered by 15 trained woman-peer leaders. The trained leaders were assigned to persuade and educate target women for six weeks, using one-on-one basis - knock door approach combined with flip-charts developed by the researchers, and home visit follow-up once a week after the first contact; whereas those in the comparison group received only an invited letter for taking cervical cancer screening and then they were encouraged by health personnel. Data were collected for two times, at baseline and after six weeks of intervention, by using a structured questionnaire. Paired t-test, Student’s t-test and Z-test were used to analyze the data. The results showed significant increase of perceived susceptibility and severity of cervical cancer as well as perceived benefit of cervical cancer screening, and significant decrease of perceived barrier of cervical cancer screening after the intervention in both groups. However, women in the experimental group had more significant improvement in their perceptions than those in the comparison group (p-value<0.001). After the intervention, the proportion of women obtaining cervical cancer screening tests in the experimental group (82.7%) was significantly higher than that in the comparison group (28.7%) (p-value<0.001). The evaluation results indicated that the promotion intervention of cervical cancer screening behavior was effective, and it should, therefore, be applied to other areas.engMahidol Univrtsitypromotion interventioncervical cancer screening behaviorwoman-peer leadersOriginal ArticleFaculty of Public Health Mahidol University