Mattia SalviniMahidol University2018-05-032018-05-032011-06-01Journal of Indian Philosophy. Vol.39, No.3 (2011), 229-24415730395002217912-s2.0-79956128975https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/11397The article discusses the relevance of the syntactical implications of the absolutive ending (lyabanta) in interpreting the Madhyamaka term upādāyaprajñapti, and hence Mūlamadhyamakakārikā 18.24. The views of both Sanskrit and Pāli classical grammarians are taken into account, and a comparison is made between some contemporary English translations of MMK 18.24 as against Candrakīrti's commentary. The conclusion suggests that Candrakīrti is grammatically accurate and perceptive, that he may have been aware of the tradition of Candragomin's grammar, and that the structural analogy between upādāyaprajñapti and pratītyasamutpāda may be relevant in understanding the relationship between notional and existential dependence. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.Mahidol UniversityArts and HumanitiesSocial SciencesReviewSCOPUS10.1007/s10781-010-9121-9