Ditthawat NonghanphithakOrawee KaewprasertPratchakan ChaiyachatWipa ReechaipichitkulAngkana ChaiprasertKiatichai FaksriKhon Kaen UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University2021-02-032021-02-032020-12-01PLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.12 December (2020)193262032-s2.0-85099023019https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60858© 2020 Nonghanphithak et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Drug resistance (DR) remains a major challenge for tuberculosis (TB) control. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides the highest genetic resolution for genotypic drug-susceptibility tests (DST). We compared DST profiles of 60 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates which were drug resistant according to agar proportion tests (one poly DR-TB, 34 multidrug-resistant TB and 25 extensively drug-resistant TB). We additionally performed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests using Sensititre MYCOTBI plates (MYCOTB) and a WGS-based DST. Agreement between WGS-based DST and MYCOTB was high for all drugs except ethambutol (65%) and ethionamide (62%). Isolates harboring the -15 c/t inhA promoter mutation had a significantly lower MIC for isoniazid than did isolates with the katG Ser315Thr mutation (p < 0.001). Similar patterns were seen for ethambutol (embB Gly406Asp vs. embB Met306Ile), streptomycin (gid Gly73Ala vs. rpsL Lys43Arg), moxifloxacin (gyrA Ala90Val vs. gyrA Asp94Gly) and rifabutin (rpoB Asp435Phe/Tyr/Val vs. rpoB Ser450Leu). For genotypic heteroresistance, isolates with lower proportion of mapped read tended to has lower MIC of anti-TB drugs than those with higher proportion. These results emphasize the high applicability of WGS for determination of DR-TB and the association of particular mutations with MIC levels.Mahidol UniversityAgricultural and Biological SciencesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyArticleSCOPUS10.1371/journal.pone.0244829