Sarawut ThepanondhPantitcha OutapaSuwadi SaikomolMahidol UniversityCenter of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology2018-12-112019-03-142018-12-112019-03-142016-01-01International Journal of GEOMATE. Vol.11, No.1 (2016), 2129-2135218629822-s2.0-84956663256https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41748© 2015, Int. J. of GEOMATE. All rights reserved. The AERMOD and CALPUFF air dispersion models are tested for their performance in predicting ground level concentration of sulfur dioxide in Thailand. Emission data used in this study are obtained from petroleum refinery complex. Predicted results are compared with those measured data using the year 2012 as a reference year. A set of statistical parameters are employed to evaluate model performance. Overall results indicated that both AERMOD and CALPUFF can provide good results. However, AERMOD can perform better in predicting of extreme end of the concentration distribution at the receptor sites. The maximum ground level concentrations of sulfur dioxide within the modeling domain are about 359 and 456 μg/m3 for AERMOD and CALPUFF simulations, respectively. This result indicates that CALPUFF provides more conservative of maximum result than predicted data from AERMOD. The decision to select an appropriate dispersion model in the study is accomplish by using the Multi-Criteria Attribute (MCA) analysis. Result from MCA supports that AERMOD is more appropriate to be applied for study of air dispersion in this area than CALPUFF system.Mahidol UniversityAgricultural and Biological SciencesEarth and Planetary SciencesEngineeringEnvironmental ScienceArticleSCOPUS