Geeratragool T.Maneerattanaporn M.Prapruetkit J.Chuenprapai P.Chongkolwatana C.Leelakusolvong S.Mahidol University2025-01-232025-01-232025-01-01Diseases of the Esophagus Vol.38 No.1 (2025)11208694https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/102976Laryngopharyngeal reflux remains a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic tool. Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) pH monitoring has been proven reliable for detecting gastric ref lux. This study aims to evaluate the association between clinical scores and MII/pH monitoring according to the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Patients with laryngo-pharyngeal symptoms (LPS) who had a ref lux symptom index (RSI) ≥13 or ref lux finding score (RFS) ≥7 underwent MII/pH monitoring. The findings were analyzed in comparison with clinical scores. A total of 100 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited for this study. MII/pH monitoring revealed a median acid exposure time (AET) of 1.9% (interquartile range [IQR] = 0.2, 4.9), with 22% of patients recording an AET above 6%. The median number of ref lux episodes was 29.5 episodes per day (IQR = 19.0, 43.8), with 7% experiencing more than 80 episodes per day. Gas ref lux was identified as the most prevalent type. Based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0, 25 patients exhibited conclusive pathological ref lux, while 75 patients showed no conclusive evidence of pathological ref lux. No significant differences were found in RSI and RFS between these groups. Only gas ref lux episodes showed a significant correlation with RSI (r = 0.255, P = 0.011). RSI and RFS among patients with LPS showed no statistically significant differences in identifying pathological ref lux or no conclusive evidence of pathological ref lux. This finding suggests that the pathophysiology underlying LPS may not be solely attributable to ref lux.MedicineAssociation between laryngopharyngeal reflux clinical scores and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring interpretation according to Lyon Consensus 2.0ArticleSCOPUS10.1093/dote/doae0982-s2.0-852146695311442205039498774