P. KosrirukvongsS. G. SladeR. G. BerkeleyMahidol University2018-07-042018-07-041997-01-01Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Vol.23, No.7 (1997), 1006-1012088633502-s2.0-0030801972https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/18199Purpose: To evaluate changes in central corneal endothelial coils and corneal thickness after divide and conquer phacoemulsification and chip and flip phacoemulsification. Setting: Houston Eye Clinic, Houston, Texas, USA. Methods: Forty-four eyes were randomly assigned to one of two groups to have divide and conquer (D/C Group) or chip and flip (C/F Group) phacoemulsification with implantation of a posterior chamber, foldable, silicone intraocular lens performed by one surgeon. Of these, 41 eyes of 37 patients (22 D/C Group, 19 C/F Group) met the inclusion criteria. All surgeries were uneventful. A complete eye examination including specular microscopy and pachymetry was performed preoperatively and 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in any of the following means: sex; age; time at 70% phaco power; total phacoemulsification time. No correlation was found between ultrasound time and increased corneal thickness except for a significant increase in percentage of hexagonal cells in the C/F Group at 1 month. The only statistically significant between-group differences were greater endothelial cell loss in the C/F Group at 1 month and the percentage change in hexagonal coils at 1 week (1.1% increase, D/C Group; 10.7% decrease, C/F Group). Conclusion: The divide and conquer technique led to less endothelial loss and hexagonal cell change than the chip and flip technique, although at 3 months the differences were not significant.Mahidol UniversityMedicineNeuroscienceCorneal endothelial changes after divide and conquer versus chip and flip phacoemulsificationArticleSCOPUS10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80072-7