Ammarin ThakkinstianHuy TranGlenn ReevesStuart MurchJohn AttiaMahidol UniversityUniversity of Newcastle, AustraliaHunter Area Pathology ServiceJohn Hunter Hospital2018-07-122018-07-122008-10-01Journal of General Internal Medicine. Vol.23, No.10 (2008), 1688-169215251497088487342-s2.0-51649089528https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/19529OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple clinical decision rule that could increase the yield of serum and urine protein electrophoresis (SPE/UPE) without loss of sensitivity. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of inpatients with a SPE/UPE performed over a 5-year period (2001-2006) with complete data on electrolytes, globulins, full blood count, creatinine, age, and gender. SETTING: A tertiary-care general teaching hospital serving the Hunter Valley in New South Wales, with a referral population of over 1 million. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 14,374 adult patients admitted between January 2001-November 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Paraprotein on serum and/or urine protein electrophoresis (SPE/UPE). RESULTS: Five points were assigned for globulin >41 g/l, 3 points for age ≥60, 2 points for each of hemoglobin <121 and male gender, and 1 point for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60. Total scores of 0-5, 6-10, and ≥11 corresponded to positive likelihood ratios of an abnormal SPE/UPE of 1, 2.5, and 6.6, respectively. The predictive ability of this model was strong, with an area under the curve of ∼0.8. Results in the validation set were almost identical. CONCLUSION: A clinical decision rule using simple clinical variables has the potential to improve the yield of SPE/UPE. This rule however needs to be verified prospectively. © 2008 Society of General Internal Medicine.Mahidol UniversityMedicineArticleSCOPUS10.1007/s11606-008-0712-z