Adisak TrinavaratLa Ongsri AtchaneeyasakulCherdchai NopmaneejumruslersKantima InsonMahidol UniversityAmbulatory Medicine2018-08-202018-08-202006-02-01Dermatology. Vol.212, No.SUPPL. 1 (2006), 35-4014219832101886652-s2.0-33745257292https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/23830Objective: Postoperative endophthalmitis reflects in part quality and safety aspects of cataract surgery. Preoperative 5% povidone-iodine was introduced as a quality improvement effort. This study evaluated the effect of this additional measure on the occurrence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Method: Topical 5% povidoneiodine solution was applied onto the ocular surface just prior to transferring the patient into the operative theater for cataract surgery. Other prophylactic measures were allowed to continue as before. Patients developing postoperative intraocular inflammation and undergoing intravitreal antibiotic injection were included as occurrences of endophthalmitis. Alteration in endophthalmitis rate was analyzed using a 'p control chart' of a statistical process control method. The incidence in the povidoneiodine-receiving group was compared to those before implementation and concurrent nonreceiving groups. Result: The postoperative endophthalmitis rate showed a significant reduction after introduction of povidone-iodine. A year before, 9 of 3,052 eyes developed endophthalmitis (0.294%). After introduction, this occurred in 4 of 4,089 eyes receiving povidone-iodine (0.097%) and 1 of 502 nonreceiving eyes (0.199%) in the following 16 months. Despite the apparent lower rate, comparison between groups was not statistically significant. Moderate to severe but tolerable eye irritation after application was reported in 6.6%. No other adverse events were detected. Conclusion: Topical preoperative 5% povidoneiodine contributed an additional effect to the reduction of the postoperative endophthalmitis rate after cataract surgery. This measure was rather safe to apply as a prophylaxis against endophthalmitis in cataract surgery. © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.Mahidol UniversityMedicineConference PaperSCOPUS10.1159/000089197