Sharon J. PeacockGrace ChiengAllen C. ChengDavid A.B. DancePremjit AmornchaiGumphol WongsuvanNittaya TeerawattanasookWirongrong ChierakulNicholas P.J. DayVanaporn WuthiekanunMahidol UniversityNuffield Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of MelbourneMenzies School of Health ResearchHealth Protection AgencySappasitthiprasong Hospital2018-06-212018-06-212005-10-01Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Vol.43, No.10 (2005), 5359-5361009511372-s2.0-26944450065https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16817Ashdown's medium, Burkholderia pseudomallei selective agar (BPSA), and a commercial Burkholderia cepacia medium were compared for their abilities to grow B. pseudomallei from 155 clinical specimens that proved positive for this organism. The sensitivity of each was equivalent; the selectivity of BPSA was lower than that of Ashdown's or B. cepacia medium. Copyright © 005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.Mahidol UniversityMedicineComparison of Ashdown's medium, Burkholderia cepacia medium, and Burkholderia pseudomallei selective agar for clinical isolation of Burkholderia pseudomalleiArticleSCOPUS10.1128/JCM.43.10.5359-5361.2005