Premjit AmornchaiWirongrong ChierakulVanaporn WuthiekanunYuvadee MahakhunkijcharoenRattanaphone PhetsouvanhBart J. CurriePaul N. NewtonNguyen Van Vinh ChauSurasakdi WongratanacheewinNicholas P.J. DaySharon J. PeacockMahidol UniversityMahosot HospitalMenzies School of Health ResearchNuffield Department of Clinical MedicineUCLKhon Kaen University2018-08-242018-08-242007-11-01Journal of Clinical Microbiology. Vol.45, No.11 (2007), 3774-3776009511372-s2.0-36349016164https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/24715In an evaluation of the API 20NE for the identification of Burkholderia spp., 792/800 (99%) Burkholderia pseudomallei and 17/19 (89%) B. cepacia isolates were correctly identified but 10 B. mallei and 98 B. thailandensis isolates were not correctly identified. A latex agglutination test was positive for 796/800 (99.5%) B. pseudomallei isolates and negative for 120 other oxidase-positive gram-negative bacilli. Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.Mahidol UniversityMedicineAccuracy of Burkholderia pseudomallei identification using the API 20NE system and a latex agglutination testArticleSCOPUS10.1128/JCM.00935-07