Rie N. PriceAnne Catrin UhlemannMichela Van VugtAl BrockmanRobert HutagalungShalini NairDenae NashPratap SinghasivanonTim J.C. AndersonSanjeev KrishnaNicholas J. WhiteFrançois NostonJohn Radcliffe HospitalSt George's University of LondonMenzies School of Health ResearchShoklo Malaria Research UnitMahidol UniversityTexas Biomedical Research Institute2018-08-202018-08-202006-06-01Clinical Infectious Diseases. Vol.42, No.11 (2006), 1570-1577105848382-s2.0-33646736568https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23744Background. Our study examined the relative contributions of host, pharmacokinetic, and parasitological factors in determining the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine (AL). Methods. On the northwest border of Thailand, patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in prospective studies of AL treatment (4- or 6-dose regimens) and followed up for 42 days. Plasma lumefantrine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography; malaria parasite pfmdr1 copy number was quantified using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR), and in vitro drug susceptibility was tested. Results. All treatments resulted in a rapid clinical response and were well tolerated. PCR-corrected failure rates at day 42 were 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6%-17%) for the 4-dose regimen and 3.2% (95% CI, 1.8%-4.6%) for the 6-dose regimen. Increased pfmdr1 copy number was associated with a 2-fold (95% CI, 1.8-2.4-fold) increase in lumefantrine inhibitory concentration50(P = .001) and an adjusted hazard ratio for risk of treatment failure following completion of a 4-dose regimen, but not a 6-dose regimen, of 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4-11; P = .008). Patients who had lumefantrine levels below 175 ng/mL on day 7 were more likely to experience recrudescence by day 42 (adjusted hazard ratio, 17; 95% CI, 5.5-53), allowing prediction of treatment failure with 75% sensitivity and 84% specificity. The 6-dose regimen ensured that therapeutic levels were achieved in 91% of treated patients. Conclusions. The lumefantrine plasma concentration profile is the main determinant of efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine. Amplification in pfmdr1 determines lumefantrine susceptibility and, therefore, treatment responses when plasma lumefantrine levels are subtherapeutic. © 2006 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.Mahidol UniversityMedicineArticleSCOPUS10.1086/503423