Emese MegléczS. J. AndersonD. BourguetR. ButcherA. CaldasA. Cassel-LundhagenA. C. D'AcierD. A. DawsonN. FaureC. FauvelotP. FranckG. HarperN. KeyghobadiC. KluetschM. MuthulakshmiJ. NagarajuA. PattF. PéténianJ. F. SilvainH. R. WilcockUniversite de Provence Aix-Marseille 1Open UniversityCentre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (CBGP)Mahidol UniversityUniversity of MarylandSveriges lantbruksuniversitetUniversity of SheffieldIRD Institut de Recherche pour le DeveloppementAlma Mater Studiorum Universita di BolognaINRA AvignonUniversity of South WalesWestern UniversityZoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander KoenigCentre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics IndiaUniversity of Hull2018-08-242018-08-242007-04-01Insect Molecular Biology. Vol.16, No.2 (2007), 175-18513652583096210752-s2.0-33847764106https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24021Although microsatellites are ubiquitous in eukaryota, the number of available markers varies strongly among taxa. This meta-analysis was conducted on 32 insect species. Sequences were obtained from two assembled whole genomes, whole genome shotgun (WGS) sequences from 10 species and screening partial genomic libraries for microsatellites from 23 species. We have demonstrated: (1) strong differences in the abundance of microsatellites among species; (2) that microsatellites within species are often grouped into families based on similarities in their flanking sequences; (3) that the proportion of microsatellites grouped into families varies strongly among taxa; and (4) that microsatellite families were significantly more often associated with transposable elements - or their remnants - than unique microsatellite sequences. © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 The Royal Entomological Society.Mahidol UniversityAgricultural and Biological SciencesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyArticleSCOPUS10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00713.x