Mehra S.Taylor A.R.Imwong M.White N.J.Watson J.A.Mahidol University2025-11-192025-11-192025-12-01Nature Communications Vol.16 No.1 (2025)https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/113097Distinguishing treatment failure (recrudescence) from reinfection in uncomplicated falciparum malaria is essential for characterising antimalarial treatment efficacy in malaria endemic areas. Classification of recrudescence versus reinfection is usually based on a comparison of parasite allelic calls derived from PCR amplification and electrophoresis of individual polymorphic markers in the acute and recurrent blood samples. Match-counting methods (e.g., 3/3 or 2/3 matching alleles) have usually been applied, but these do not account for multiple comparisons per-marker when infections are polyclonal. We show that when infections are polyclonal, as is common in high transmission settings, currently used match-counting and model-based methods may have unacceptably high false-discovery rates leading to overestimation of treatment failure. We develop the software PfRecur which provides analytical Bayesian posterior probabilities of treatment failure in recurrent falciparum malaria. We use data from a recent study in Angola to demonstrate the potential utility of our model in resolving complex polyclonal P. falciparum infections, thereby providing more accurate estimation of treatment failure rates.ChemistryChemistryBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyPhysics and AstronomyPhysics and AstronomyMultidisciplinaryArticleSCOPUS10.1038/s41467-025-64830-z2-s2.0-1050213001782041172341213954