Publication: Usefulness of a molecular strategy for the detection of bacterial DNA in patients with severe sepsis undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
Issued Date
2006-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
02535068
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-33845753436
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Blood Purification. Vol.25, No.1 (2006), 106-111
Suggested Citation
Ranistha Ratanarat, Stefania Cazzavillan, Zaccaria Ricci, Mario Rassu, Chiara Segala, Massimo Decal, Dinna Cruz, Valentina Corradi, Stefania Manfro, Eric Roessler, Nathan Levin, Claudio Ronco Usefulness of a molecular strategy for the detection of bacterial DNA in patients with severe sepsis undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood Purification. Vol.25, No.1 (2006), 106-111. doi:10.1159/000096406 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/23460
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Usefulness of a molecular strategy for the detection of bacterial DNA in patients with severe sepsis undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Sepsis is associated with cell necrosis and apoptosis. Circulating plasma levels of DNA have been found in conditions associated with cell death, including sepsis, pregnancy, stroke, myocardial infarction and trauma. Plasma DNA can also derive from bacteria. We have recently implemented a method to detect bacterial DNA and, in the present study, we validated this technique comparing it to standard blood culture in terms of diagnostic efficacy. Methods: We examined a cohort of 9 critically ill patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis and acute renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We analyzed bacterial DNA in blood, hemofilters, and ultrafiltrate (UF) by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Standard blood cultures were performed for all patients. Results: The blood cultures from 2 of the 9 (22%) patients were positive. However, bacterial DNA was identified in the blood of 6 patients (67%), including the 2 septic patients with positive blood cultures. In 9 (100%) patients bacterial DNA was found on the filter blood side, whereas in 7 (78%) subjects it was found in the dialysate compartment of the hemofilters. Bacterial DNA was never detected in the UF. Conclusions: Using the 16S rRNA gene, the detection of bacterial DNA in blood and adsorbed within the filter could be a useful screening tool in clinically septic, blood culture-negative patients undergoing CRRT. However, the identification of the etiologic agent is not feasible with this technique because specific primers for the defined bacteria must be used to further identify the suspected pathogenic organisms. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG.