Browsing by Author "Chawannuch Ruaengsri"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    The hemodynamic and atrial electrophysiologic consequences of chronic left atrial volume overload in a controllable canine model
    (2018-11-01) Chawannuch Ruaengsri; Matthew R. Schill; Timothy S. Lancaster; Ali J. Khiabani; Joshua L. Manghelli; Daniel I. Carter; Jason W. Greenberg; Spencer J. Melby; Richard B. Schuessler; Ralph J. Damiano; Barnes-Jewish Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
    © 2018 Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of chronic left atrial volume overload on atrial anatomy, hemodynamics, and electrophysiology using a titratable left ventriculoatrial shunt in a canine model. Methods: Canines (n = 16) underwent implantation of a shunt between the left ventricle and the left atrium. Sham animals (n = 8) underwent a median sternotomy without a shunt. Atrial activation times and effective refractory periods were determined using 250-bipolar epicardial electrodes. Biatrial pressures, systemic pressures, left atrial and left ventricle diameters and volumes, atrial fibrillation inducibility, and durations were recorded at the initial and at 6-month terminal study. Results: Baseline shunt fraction was 46% ± 8%. The left atrial pressure increased from 9.7 ± 3.5 mm Hg to 13.8 ± 4 mm Hg (P <.001). At the terminal study, the left atrial diameter increased from a baseline of 2.9 ± 0.05 cm to 4.1 ± 0.6 cm (P <.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 64% ± 1.5% to 54% ± 2.7% (P <.001). Induced atrial fibrillation duration (median, range) was 95 seconds (0-7200) compared with 0 seconds (0-40) in the sham group (P =.02). The total activation time was longer in the shunt group compared with the sham group (72 ± 11 ms vs 62 ± 3 ms, P =.003). The right atrial and not left atrial effective refractory periods were shorter in the shunt compared with the sham group (right atrial effective refractory period: 156 ± 11 ms vs 141 ± 11 ms, P =.005; left atrial effective refractory period: 142 ± 23 ms vs 133 ± 11 ms, P =.35). Conclusions: This canine model of mitral regurgitation reproduced the mechanical and electrical remodeling seen in clinical mitral regurgitation. Left atrial size increased, with a corresponding decrease in left ventricle systolic function, and an increased atrial activation times, lower effective refractory periods, and increased atrial fibrillation inducibility. This model provides a means to understand the remodeling by which mitral regurgitation causes atrial fibrillation.