Browsing by Author "Pittayawonganon C."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Metadata only Genetic basis of sudden death after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand(2022-11-01) Ittiwut C.; Mahasirimongkol S.; Srisont S.; Ittiwut R.; Chockjamsai M.; Durongkadech P.; Sawaengdee W.; Khunphon A.; Larpadisorn K.; Wattanapokayakit S.; Wetchaphanphesat S.; Arunotong S.; Srimahachota S.; Pittayawonganon C.; Thammawijaya P.; Sutdan D.; Doungngern P.; Khongphatthanayothin A.; Kerr S.J.; Shotelersuk V.; Mahidol UniversityBackground: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination reduces morbidity and mortality associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); unfortunately, it is associated with serious adverse events, including sudden unexplained death (SUD). Objective: We aimed to study the genetic basis of SUD after COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand. Methods: From April to December 2021, cases with natural but unexplained death within 7 days of COVID-19 vaccination were enrolled for whole exome sequencing. Results: Thirteen were recruited, aged between 23 and 72 years; 10 (77%) were men, 12 were Thai; and 1 was Australian. Eight (61%) died after receiving the first dose of vaccine, and 7 (54%) died after receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; however, there were no significant correlations between SUD and either the number or the type of vaccine. Fever was self-reported in 3 cases. Ten (77%) and 11 (85%) died within 24 hours and 3 days of vaccination, respectively. Whole exome sequencing analysis revealed that 5 cases harbored SCN5A variants that had previously been identified in patients with Brugada syndrome, giving an SCN5A variant frequency of 38% (5 of 13). This is a significantly higher rate than that observed in Thai SUD cases occurring 8–30 days after COVID-19 vaccination during the same period (10% [1 of 10]), in a Thai SUD cohort studied before the COVID-19 pandemic (12% [3 of 25]), and in our in-house exome database (12% [386 of 3231]). Conclusion: These findings suggest that SCN5A variants may be associated with SUD within 7 days of COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of vaccine type, number of vaccine dose, and presence of underlying diseases or postvaccine fever.Item Metadata only Safety and immunogenicity of locally produced trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Tri Fluvac) in healthy Thai adults aged 18–64 years in Nakhon Phanom: A Phase III double blinded, three-arm, randomized, controlled trial(2023-01-01) Prasert K.; Praphasiri P.; Lerdsamran H.; Nakphook S.; Ditsungnoen D.; Chawalchitiporn S.; Sornwong K.; Poopipatpol K.; Wirachwong P.; Narakorn P.; Surichan S.; Suthepakul N.; Thangsupanimitchai N.; Pittayawonganon C.; Puthavathana P.; Davis W.W.; Mott J.A.; Olsen S.J.; Patumanond J.; Mahidol UniversityBackground: Domestic influenza vaccine production facilitates a sustainable supply for mitigating seasonal influenza and improves national health security by providing infrastructure and experience for pandemic vaccine production, if needed. Methods: A Phase III, double blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from Sep 2019-Oct 2020 in healthy adults 18–64 years in Nakhon Phanom, Thailand. Randomization (3:3:1) compared study vaccine (Tri Fluvac), saline placebo, and an active comparator (licensed vaccine). Primary outcomes were superior efficacy compared to placebo based on RT-PCR-confirmed influenza virus infection within 12 months and non-inferiority compared to active comparator based on immunogenicity (HAI assay) at 28 days. Safety was also assessed. Results: The trial enrolled 4,284 participants (Tri Fluvac = 1,836; placebo = 1,836; active comparator = 612). There were 29 RT-PCR positive influenza infections (10 Tri Fluvac, 5.5/1,000 PY; 19 placebo, 10.4/1,000PY; 0 comparator) for an absolute protective efficacy of 46.4 (95 % CI = −22.0–76.5) compared with placebo, but the power was 43.7 %. Seroconversion difference rates between Tri Fluvac and comparator at Day 28 were 1.74 (95 % CI: −2.77, 6.25), 2.22 (−2.40, 6.84), and −0.57 (−5.41, 4.27) for A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B strains, respectively. Adverse and severe adverse events occurred in 175 (9.5 %) Tri Fluvac, 177 (10.8 %) placebo, and 66 (10.8 %) comparator arms (p-value = 0.437, Tri Fluvac vs. comparator) Conclusions: Tri Fluvac was well tolerated, and immunogenicity was non-inferior to the active comparator, meeting U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for adult vaccine licensure. Few acute respiratory infections were reported during intense COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, resulting in insufficient power to evaluate clinical efficacy.
