Publication:
Firms' strategies and network externalities: empirical evidence from the browser war.

dc.contributor.authorYingyot Chiaravutthien_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. International College. Business Administration Division.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-24T08:42:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-22T03:35:30Z
dc.date.available2014-10-24T08:42:26Z
dc.date.available2018-02-22T03:35:30Z
dc.date.created2014-10-24
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes adoption decisions of Internet browser software with the focus on firms’ strategies and market consequences, and the existence of network externalities. Since the early 1995, Microsoft employed many strategies in order to diminish the popularity of Netscape’s Navigator and Communicator. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer finally won the war in 1999, but this led to the antitrust lawsuit. Based on the GVU WWW User Survey data in 1997 and 1998, the results from logit models show that network externalities existed in Navigator and Communicator although they were diminishing through time. The success of Internet Explorer was driven by Microsoft’s free and bundling strategies, not by the product itself nor by network externalities.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of High Technolgy Management Research. Vol. 17, (2006), 27-42en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/8782
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol University.en_US
dc.subjectBrowseren_US
dc.subjectNetwork externalitiesen_US
dc.subjectFirm strategyen_US
dc.subjectPredatory pricingen_US
dc.subjectBundlingen_US
dc.titleFirms' strategies and network externalities: empirical evidence from the browser war.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mods.location.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047831006000046

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections