3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication Open Access Application of mobile-technology for disease and treatment monitoring of malaria in the "Better Border Healthcare Programme"(2010-08) Pongthep Meankaew; พงษ์เทพ เมียนแก้ว; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; จรณิต แก้วกังวาล; Amnat Khamsiriwatchara; อำนาจ คำศิริวัชรา; Podjadeach Khunthong; พจเดช ขุนทอง; Pratap Singhasivanon; ประตาป สิงหศิวานนท์; Wichai Satimai; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Mahidol University. Faculty of Tropical Medicine. Department of Tropical Hygienetechnologies was developed as a proof of concept, in an attempt to replace the existing manual, paper-based activities that malaria staff used in treating and caring for malaria patients in the villages for which they were responsible. After a patient... for both Thai and migrant patients were about 94-99% on Day 7 (Plasmodium falciparum) and Day 14 (Plasmodium vivax) and maintained at 84-93% on Day 90. Adherence to anti-malarial drug therapy, based on self-reporting, showed high completion rate for PPublication Open Access Are there any changes in burden and management of communicable diseases in areas affected by Cyclone Nargis?(2011-06-28) Myint, Nyan Win; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; จรณิต แก้วกังวาล; Pratap Singhasivanon; ประตาป สิงหศิวานนท์; Kamron Chaisiri; Pornpet Panjapiyakul; Pichit Siriwan; Mallik, Arun K.; Nyein, Soe Lwin; Mu, Thet Thet; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Mahidol University. Faculty of Tropical Medicinein Nargis-affected areas, population-based mortality rates for all other communicable diseases showed no significant change in 2008 in these areas, compared to 2007 and 2009. Tuberculosis control programs reached their targets of 70% case detection and 85Publication Open Access Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand(2015) Pornpimon Adams; Sukanya Prakobtham; Chanthima Limphattharacharoen; Pitchapa Vutikes; Srisin Khusmith; Krisana Pengsaa; Polrat Wilairatana; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Mahidol University. Faculty of Tropical Medicine. Department of Tropical HygieneBackground: Malaria research is typically conducted in developing countries in areas of endemic disease. This raises specific ethical issues, including those related to local cultural concepts of health and disease, the educational background of study subjects, and principles of justice at the community and country level. Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are responsible for regulating the ethical conduct of research, but questions have been raised whether RECs facilitate or impede research, and about the quality of REC review itself. This study examines the review process for malaria research proposals submitted to the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine at Mahidol University, Thailand. Methods: Proposals for all studies submitted for review from January 2010 to December 2014 were included. Individual REC members’ reviewing forms were evaluated. Ethical issues (e.g., scientific merit, risk–benefit, sample size, or informed-consent) raised in the forms were counted and analysed according to characteristics, including study classification/ design, use of specimens, study site, and study population. Results: All 114 proposals submitted during the study period were analysed, comprising biomedical studies (17 %), drug trials (13 %), laboratory studies (24 %) and epidemiological studies (46 %). They included multi-site (13 %) and international studies (4 %), and those involving minority populations (28 %), children (17 %) and pregnant women (7 %). Drug trials had the highest proportion of questions raised for most ethical issues, while issues concerning privacy and confidentiality tended to be highest for laboratory and epidemiology studies. Clarifications on ethical issues were requested by the ethics committee more for proposals involving new specimen collection. Studies involving stored data and specimens tended to attract more issues around privacy and confidentiality. Proposals involving minority populations were more likely to raise issues than those that did not. Those involving vulnerable populations were more likely to attract concerns related to study rationale and design. Conclusions: This study stratified ethical issues raised in a broad spectrum of research proposals. The Faculty of Tropical Medicine at Mahidol University is a significant contributor to global malaria research output. The findings shed light on the ethical review process that may be useful for stakeholders, including researchers, RECs and sponsors, conducting malaria research in other endemic settings.