Publication:
Changes in Attitudes and Actual Practice of Oxygen Therapy in ICUs after Implementation of a Conservative Oxygenation Guideline

dc.contributor.authorChloe Ca Grimen_US
dc.contributor.authorHendrik Jf Helmerhorsten_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Schultzen_US
dc.contributor.authorTineke Wintersen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Hj van der Voorten_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid J. van Westerlooen_US
dc.contributor.authorEvert de Jongeen_US
dc.contributor.otherOur Lady Hospital - Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherLeiden University Medical Center - LUMCen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T05:40:05Z
dc.date.available2020-10-05T05:40:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises. BACKGROUND: Little is known to what extent attitudes of ICU clinicians are influenced by new insights and recommendations to be more conservative with oxygen therapy. Our aim was to investigate whether implementation of a conservative oxygenation guideline structurally changed self-reported attitudes and actual clinical practice. METHODS: After the implementation of a conservative oxygen therapy guideline in 3 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands, ICU clinicians were surveyed regarding their attitudes toward oxygen therapy. The survey results were compared with survey results taken before the introduction of the new guideline. Arterial blood gas analysis data and ventilator settings were retrieved from all patients admitted to the participating ICUs in the studied period, and changes after implementing the guideline were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 180 ICU clinicians returned the survey. Compared to before implementation of a conservative oxygen guideline, more clinicians chose a preferred [Formula: see text] and an oxygen saturation measured from an arterial sample ([Formula: see text]) limit after implementation of the guideline. In general, clinicians reported a more conservative approach toward management of [Formula: see text] and less frequently increased the [Formula: see text]. In the period after the active implementation of the guideline, 5,840 subjects were admitted to the participating ICUs and 101,869 arterial blood gas analyses were retrieved. Actual practice changed with overall lower oxygenation levels (median [Formula: see text] 77.93 mm Hg, compared to 86.93 mm Hg before implementation) of arterial blood and a decrease of PEEP and [Formula: see text]. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a conservative oxygenation guideline was an effective method that changed self-reported attitudes and actual clinical practice and improved adherence to conservative oxygenation targets in a short period of time.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory care. Vol.65, No.10 (2020), 1502-1510en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.07527en_US
dc.identifier.issn19433654en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85088208619en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/59150
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088208619&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleChanges in Attitudes and Actual Practice of Oxygen Therapy in ICUs after Implementation of a Conservative Oxygenation Guidelineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088208619&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections